تعبير عن السلام بالانجليزي

موضوع انجليزي عن الماء للصف الثامن فقرة  برزنتيشن بحث موضوع ملخص جاهز باللغة الانجليزية  انشاء موضوع انجليزي عن ابدا قصير كيفية كتابة موضوع تعبير باللغة الانجليزية توجيهي قواعد كتابة تعبير  بالانجليزي طريقة سهلة لكتابة تعبير بالانجليزي موضوع تعبير انجليزي يصلح لكل المواضيع كتابة تعبير بالانجليزي عن نفسك وصف تعبير انجليزي يصلح لكل المواضيع موضوع انشاء شامل لكل المواضيع موضوع يصلح لجميع المواضيع موضوع تعبير انجليزي جاهز برجراف ينفع لاى موضوع  موضوع انجليزي عن الماء قصير وسهل فوائد بالانجليزي عبارات  بالانجليزي طويل اهمية مترجم ثالث ثانوي اول ثاني ثانوي متوسط خمس سبع ثمان تسع اربع جمل كلمات كلام مقال علمي مقدمة بحث انجليزي حلول اسباب حل مشكلة 

Since the world is a world, humanity is waging war. What are history books if not a series of dates of battles and conquests? From simple prehistoric clan wars to modern nuclear weapons, there is one constant: man's inability to get along with his fellow man.

What does not help is that the man himself is an ambivalence. For example, it organizes peace marches that turn violent; we see the proponents of the pro-life movement hold speeches that are sometimes so virulent that we believe they want to put to death the proponents of abortion and the death penalty. In short, we want peace, but we are ready to fight to the death to obtain it.

How is it that in the 21st century, science has evolved to the point of sending probes to Mars but we still do not understand the A-B-C of human behavior? Should humanity be doomed to self-destruct?

The other day I was watching a TV report about the history of humanity. It explained that the arrival of man on earth is a recent phenomenon in relation to the age of the planet. To illustrate this idea, we had spread the history of the world on a scale of one year: January 1 represented the birth of the earth and December 31, our current century. On this twelve-month scale, the arrival of the man was very late, that is to say at the very end of November. So, for most of its history, the land and its people had lived in perfect harmony. And then suddenly, the man had appeared. And in less time than it takes to say, he managed to annihilate millions of animal and plant species, to pollute the air and the water, to shave the forests and to bleed the rocks of their minerals . And now he was getting ready to annihilate himself.

Like many people, I say to myself: is this really our fate or is there a solution that escapes us? And if it exists, this solution, why have not we found it yet? And then how can we hope to establish peace between nations when we can not even get along with members of the same family, between neighbors or even within a couple?

If one is female, it is dangerously tempting to blame all the evils of society on the male of the species. I admit that my eternal feminine sometimes fantasizes by imagining a sci-fi scenario, that is to say a world where the testosterone level would be controlled so that our men behave like lambs

. But then, what would we do with men effeminate, without muscles and without stomach? We women have been used to better than that, have not we? We like our men to stand up. We want pink men, not wimps.

No, wanting to change men is not the solution, any more than wanting to replace patriarchy with matriarchy. There is no evidence that women alone would manage the planet better than their companions. It would be different, certainly. But better?

I hear you cringe, dear sisters, and I explain myself. Let's not forget that we women are fighting hard for us too; not in the same way as men but just as violently. We are masters in the art of manipulating. We mutilate each other with nasty words, words capable of mortally wounding self-esteem. We cunning, we invite ourselves with a smile, we make cowards. In short, we are not angels. That said, statistics show that we do not have the easy trigger like our men - murderers, serial killers and dictators accused of crimes against humanity are rarely women. And it is perhaps in this respect that the salvation of the species is found.

To avoid the automatic recourse to weapons as soon as a conflict is announced, it would therefore be necessary for the voice of women to temper the martial spirit. For that, it would first be necessary to arrive at a balance between the sexes. We should give the runner a chance and consider a world that attaches so much importance to feminine and masculine values. A world where history books would not only talk about killing, but also collaboration, ecology and veneration for what lives.

Imagine if there were as many women as men in the UN and in all the parliaments of the world, perhaps we would be entitled to a better quality of life and would we reach viable consensus to settle our disputes?

Unfortunately, there is still a long way to go before arriving there. The most advanced nations from the point of view of gender equality are still a minority. Even women who hold power in so-called evolved countries still have to behave like men to be respected.

No, there is no quick fix in the short term. But I am convinced that a better distribution of power would contribute to a healthy balance and greatly improve our chances of survival.

Give peace a chance, said John Lennon. We must strive for peace, of course, but we must do it together. If history proves one thing, it is that left to themselves, our men have not yet arrived to establish a lasting peace.